A old idea made new. |
Now there’s a new “Mechanical Turk”, which works in much the
same fashion, using human operators to perform tasks that, although seemingly
as simple as moving a chess piece, are currently beyond the ability of computer
programs to reliably perform.
What sort of tasks? Well, determining from a sentence
whether the general sentiment of the text is positive, negative, mixed or
neutral, or determining whether a particular image is relevant to text of a
search query that revealed said picture in a website, and the significance of
the same image in terms of size, placement, and quality on the same page.
Today’s Turk is a little-known application hosted by Amazon
that allows businesses to post HITS (Human Intelligence Tasks) that an army of
human workers (known as “Turkers”) can work remotely from their computers for
compensation ranging from a few cents to several dollars per task.
On the surface, it’s an interesting idea – there is work to
be found here – and with about 100,000 HITS available to be worked on a daily
basis at an average value of perhaps 50 cents, there’s also money to be made,
which has drawn an estimated 100,000 Turkers in 100+ countries (although many
are based out of the US, and demographics suggest they are generally lower-income individuals.)
Because of the low pay and repetitive nature of much of the
work, the Turk has been criticized as a sort of modern sweatshop, and certainly
it’s not the most interesting sort of remote work that can be found on the
internet, which includes everything from farming gold in World of Warcraft to
selling designer clothes and shoes in Second Life.
On the other hand, anyone can get started Turking with just basic computer skills, a few easily accessible web tools - I used Google Translate to help
with that task of determining the sentiment in sentences (which were written in
German) – and some time on their hands.
That’s what I thought the strength of this approach to crowd-sourcing
might be; a student in a boring class or a worker in an office job that
requires them to be present but not necessarily busy might find the Turk to be
both a welcome distraction and a means of extracting a little more monetary
value from time spent glued to a seat by the demands of an antiquated approach
to work or education.
To check it out, I set up an account (easy to do if you
already shop with Amazon) and jumped in looking for HITS while sitting in a
class of the aforementioned Neolithic style, then continued the exercise while
stuck in a taxi in for a couple of hours in city traffic.
My experience was that tasks that pay well (for example, the
German sentence sentiment exercise) actually involved a fairly significant
degree of both work (translating, rating, etc.) and concentration, which made
difficult to multi-task effectively between class participation and HIT
completion (HITs have a specific timeframe, ranging from a few minutes to
several hours for completion.) Tasks that pay lesser amounts, such as the “quality/relevance
of pictures in webpages” HIT are quicker to complete, but still require some effort.
Some people may find these tasks interesting, despite their repetitive nature –
but I doubt anyone could happily make a living by Turking.
I also found the interface a bit clumsy, and many tasks
required “qualification” tests which, while useful to the business in finding
qualified Turkers, was annoying to the person who wanted to get right into
doing some electronic drudge work. There was also a good number of tasks that
appeared to be scammish in nature (requiring a website sign-up to complete the
task) and HIT-spam, where a single job site posted 60 or 80 very similar HITS,
which, due to the nature of the sort/filter tools available, forced the Turker
to flip through several pages worth of undesirable HITS to find a more desirable
source of employment.
These are strange complaints for a site associated with
Amazon, but it turns out the association is very loose indeed – the Turk was originally designed by an Amazon employee to help the company find and
eliminate duplicates in its own product description page, but expanded to
become a crowd-sourcing tool which has been used for such tasks as finding
missing persons, transcribing podcasts, generating blog content, and driving
traffic to websites. Now, although Amazon hosts the site and takes a 10%
commission off each job, it doesn’t actively monitor the service and refers
people who complain to the company or individual who posted the offending HIT.
The bottom line? The Turk represents an interesting first
effort at creating something that will be increasingly common in the future workplace;
a market where content developers and “human intelligence” workers can find
employment, on their own time and terms, capable of working remotely from
anywhere on the planet, and potentially reducing pollution and congestion by
allowing digital workers to earn their income from the comfort of their own
homes. However, the current market lacks protections for the workers (in the
form of stipulated minimum compensation) or protections for society, since many
of the jobs offered are designed to skew perspectives of search results, etc.
Is the website that pops to the top of your search queue really popular (and
thus, presumably, a valuable source of your desired information) or has it
attained that rank due to blind clicks by a mercenary army of Turkers?
The race should be on to develop a common global online
market, where anyone from retail giants such as Amazon and Walmart to
individuals sitting in their underwear in front of a laptop can offer their
goods and services, accept compensation, and schedule delivery to any other
citizen in the world; secure from spammers and scammers, with fair-trade wages and
prices paid, and a feedback system in place to reward good performance and
reveal poor performance. The pieces of such a system already exist – we have
price comparison sites, online retailers, auction sites, and rating sites. But
to tie them together in a simple, easy-to-use interface – that would be a
parlor trick worthy of Wolfgang von Kempelen.
No comments:
Post a Comment